When LGSCO is the right route
The Ombudsman handles complaints about how the LA has acted — its decisions, processes, communication, and compliance with duties. Common LGSCO-suitable EHCP complaints:
- LA missed the 6-week assessment decision deadline
- LA missed the 20-week final EHCP deadline
- LA failed to deliver Section F provision once the EHCP was finalised
- Annual review delayed or final amended plan late
- LA failed to consult required professionals during assessment
- LA did not respond to correspondence within published timescales
- LA's complaint handling itself was inadequate
- LA fail to provide alternative education under section 19 EA 1996
- LA failure to act on Tribunal orders within the deadline
LGSCO vs SEND Tribunal — which route?
SEND Tribunal
For: Refusal to assess, refusal to issue, content of Sections B/F/I, cease to maintain
Remedies: Order LA to assess/issue/amend/maintain. Substantive decision on the EHCP itself.
LGSCO
For: Process failures, delays, failure to deliver provision, communication, complaint handling
Remedies: Financial remedy, apology, service improvements. Cannot reverse Tribunal-eligible decisions.
Both routes can run in parallel for different issues. For example: a Tribunal appeal on Section F content and an LGSCO complaint about the delay in issuing the EHCP that gave rise to the appeal.
How to complain to the LGSCO about an EHCP
- 1
Complete the LA's own complaints process
LGSCO normally requires this. Most LAs have two stages — write to the LA following its published complaints procedure. Keep copies of everything. Allow the timescales the LA has published before escalating.
- 2
Build a clear timeline
Document every relevant event with dates: requests, decisions, missed deadlines, communications, impact. The Ombudsman case turns on the chronology — make it precise.
- 3
Identify the maladministration
What did the LA do wrong? Be specific: missed statutory deadline, failed to consult required professional, breached section 42 duty, did not respond to correspondence within their own published timescales. Reference law and policy.
- 4
Identify the injustice
What was the impact on the child and family? Lost provision, missed school, distress, time and trouble pursuing the LA, parent time off work, etc. The Ombudsman remedies the injustice, so quantify it.
- 5
Submit the LGSCO complaint
Use the LGSCO online form at lgo.org.uk. Attach key documents (decisions, correspondence). Set out the maladministration, the injustice, what you have already done, and what remedy you want.
- 6
Engage with the investigation
The investigator may ask for further information. Respond promptly. The LA will be asked for its version of events; you may get the chance to comment. Final decision letter is binding on the LA in practice.
Typical LGSCO remedies for EHCP failures
The Ombudsman's published Guidance on Remedies sets out common award ranges:
- Time and trouble for pursuing the complaint: typically £100-£500
- Distress remedy: typically £100-£500 per affected family member
- Lost provision: £200-£1,000 per term of missed Section F provision (more for severe needs)
- Lost education due to delay: variable, often £500-£2,500 per term
- Late EHCP issuing: typically £100-£300 per month of delay
- Service improvements: required changes to LA processes
- Apology: from senior officer or director
- Specific actions: expediting decisions, completing reviews, etc.
Building your LGSCO complaint pack
- LA's complaints process completed (both stages)
- Timeline of events with precise dates
- Copies of all relevant correspondence
- Copies of the EHCP, decisions, professional reports
- Identification of specific maladministration (with reference to law/policy)
- Quantification of injustice (lost provision, distress, time)
- Statement of remedy sought
- LGSCO online form completed at lgo.org.uk
Common LGSCO complaint pitfalls
- Trying to use LGSCO instead of SEND Tribunal for refusal/content/cease decisions — wrong route
- Submitting before completing LA complaints process — premature
- Vague maladministration claims without specific reference to law/policy
- Not quantifying the injustice or asking for specific remedy
- Mixing too many issues without clear prioritisation
- Time limits — generally must complain within 12 months of becoming aware of issue