Quick reference: what each section covers
Section A — The views, interests and aspirations of the child and parents
A short narrative section capturing what the child wants, what is important to them, what they enjoy, and what their parents hope for. Often written collaboratively or in the child's own voice. Not appealable, but important — it should inform the outcomes (Section E) and provision (Section F).
- Use direct quotes where possible
- Cover education, social, emotional, and aspirations
- Make it specific to your child — generic descriptions are less useful
Section B — Special educational needs (SEN)
A description of every special educational need your child has, drawn from the assessment evidence. Section B is the foundation — every need described here must have corresponding provision in Section F. Appealable.
- Each professional report's findings should appear here
- Group needs by area: cognition and learning, communication and interaction, social/emotional/mental health, sensory/physical
- If a report identifies a need and Section B does not capture it, raise this in the draft stage
Read more in our dedicated guide to appealing Section B.
Section C — Health needs that relate to SEN
Health needs that affect or arise from the child's SEN. Not all health needs go here — only those linked to the SEN. Drawn from health professional advice provided during assessment. Not appealable to SEND Tribunal but can be raised in NHS complaints.
- Should reflect paediatric, CAMHS, OT, SALT, or other clinical reports
- Includes mental health needs that affect education
- Section G provision must address each Section C need
Section D — Social care needs that relate to SEN
Social care needs identified through the assessment, including any 'children in need' assessment under section 17 of the Children Act 1989 or disabled children's assessment. Not appealable to Tribunal but can be challenged through the LA complaints process or LGSCO.
- Often under-developed in EHCPs because LA social care teams are slow to engage
- Request a Children and Families Act assessment alongside the EHC assessment if you have not had one
- Sections H1 and H2 must address each Section D need
Section E — Outcomes sought
The outcomes the EHCP is intended to help the child achieve, typically over the next year and at the end of each phase of education. Outcomes should be SMART: specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound. Not appealable on its own, but if outcomes are wrong they will infect Section F.
- Each outcome should map to needs in B/C/D
- Avoid vague outcomes ('to make progress') — they should be measurable
- Long-term aspirations (Section A) should inform long-term outcomes
Section F — Special educational provision (SEP)
The legally enforceable provision the LA must secure. Must be specific, detailed and quantified — type, frequency, duration, and who delivers it. This is the only section that gives your child a personally enforceable right to specific support. Appealable.
- Every Section B need must have corresponding Section F provision
- Watch for vague phrases: 'access to', 'as required', 'where appropriate', 'regular', 'opportunities for'
- Provision should specify the qualification of the person delivering it (e.g. qualified speech and language therapist, not 'appropriate professional')
Read more in our dedicated guide to appealing Section F.
Section G — Health provision
Provision the responsible commissioning health body (typically the ICB — Integrated Care Board) reasonably considers necessary to meet Section C needs. Not appealable to SEND Tribunal but can be challenged through NHS complaints and the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.
- Each Section C health need should have corresponding Section G provision
- If health provision is named here, the ICB must commission it
- Disputes can be referred to the National Trial of extended SEND Tribunal powers in some areas
Section H1 — Social care provision required under CSDPA 1970 (under 18s)
Social care provision the LA must provide under section 2 of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970 — for children under 18 with disabilities. This duty is enforceable through the LA's own complaints process and judicial review.
- Triggered by a disability assessment under section 17 of the Children Act 1989
- Provision is whatever the LA assesses as needed — it is a hard-edged duty, not subject to resources
- Examples: short breaks, direct payments for care, equipment
Section H2 — Other social care provision
Any other social care provision the LA reasonably considers necessary, including provision under the Care Act 2014 for young people aged 18+. Not appealable to SEND Tribunal but enforceable through complaints, LGSCO, and judicial review.
- Particularly relevant from age 18 when transition to adult services begins
- Includes residential placements, supported accommodation, day services for adults
- Should reflect the outcomes in Section E for post-18 living
Section I — Name of the school or other institution to be attended
The school or institution your child will attend, named individually (not 'a mainstream primary'). The LA must consult the school under section 39 of the Children and Families Act 2014 and name it unless narrow exceptions apply (unsuitable to age/aptitude/SEN, incompatible with efficient education of others, or incompatible with efficient use of resources). Appealable.
- You can name maintained schools, academies, FE colleges, NHS hospital schools, and independent special schools approved under section 41
- For other independent schools, you can ask but the LA is not bound to name (section 9 cost arguments may apply)
- Type of school (mainstream/special) is also part of Section I and is appealable
Read more in our dedicated guide to appealing Section I.
Section J — Personal budget
Where requested and agreed, the personal budget for elements of the provision in Sections F, G, H1 or H2. Can be a direct payment to the family, a notional budget held by the LA, or a third-party arrangement. Not appealable to SEND Tribunal but appealable to the LA's adult social care complaints process where it relates to social care.
- Right to request — request in writing during assessment or at annual review
- LA must consider but can refuse with reasons
- Elements of Section F (e.g. specialist teaching) can sometimes be paid via personal budget
Section K — Advice and information gathered
A list of all the advice and information gathered during the EHC needs assessment. The reports themselves are usually attached as appendices to the plan. Not appealable but useful — if a report is not listed, it may not have been considered.
- Check that all reports you submitted are listed
- If a critical report is missing, ask the LA to include it
- Section K is the foundation for Tribunal evidence — every report listed here should be in your bundle
Reviewing each section of a draft or final EHCP
- Section A reflects your child's actual voice and your aspirations
- Section B captures every need identified in the professional reports
- Section C and G match — every health need has corresponding health provision
- Section D and H1/H2 match — every social care need has corresponding provision
- Section E outcomes are SMART and link back to needs
- Section F is specific, detailed and quantified — no vague language
- Section F contains provision for every need in Section B
- Section I names the school individually and reflects your preference where lawful
- Section J reflects any personal budget you have requested
- Section K lists every report submitted
Common drafting errors LAs make in each section
- Section B copied from previous year's plan without updating to reflect new evidence
- Section C describing all health conditions, not just those related to SEN
- Section E containing only generic outcomes ('to make progress in literacy')
- Section F using vague language ('regular access to', 'as required', 'when appropriate')
- Section F omitting provision for needs identified in Section B
- Section H1 missing entirely because no children's social care assessment has happened
- Section I naming a school type ('mainstream primary') instead of an individual school
- Section K not listing reports that were submitted but rejected by the LA