Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | SEN support | EHCP |
|---|---|---|
| Legal basis | Chapter 6 SEND Code of Practice | Sections 37 & 42 CFA 2014 |
| Issued by | School (SENDCO) | Local authority |
| Legally binding | No — best-endeavours duty | Yes — provision must be secured |
| Funding | School's notional SEN budget (~£6,000/yr) | Notional SEN + top-up from LA |
| Typical provision | Differentiation, group/1:1 interventions, adjustments | Named therapies, 1:1 staffing, specialist setting |
| Reviews | Termly with parents | Annual review (statutory) |
| Right of appeal | No statutory appeal — only complaints | Full SEND Tribunal appeal rights |
| Suitable for | Most children with mild–moderate SEN | Children whose needs cannot be met from school resources alone |
Where the line sits in law
Section 20 CFA 2014 defines SEN as a learning difficulty or disability that calls for special educational provision. Most pupils with SEN do not need an EHCP — SEN support is sufficient. Section 36(8) CFA 2014 sets the threshold for an EHC needs assessment: the LA must assess where it appears the child has or may have SEN, and it may be necessary for provision to be made through an EHCP. Section 37 sets the threshold for issuing the plan: the LA must issue if it is necessary for special educational provision to be made through an EHCP.
In practice, the test the SEND Tribunal applies is: can the special educational provision your child reasonably requires be secured through the resources normally available to mainstream schools, or is something more specified, more intensive, or more specialist required? If the latter, the EHCP threshold is likely met.
How to decide which to pursue
- 1
Identify the difficulties clearly
Note specific examples — academic, social, emotional, sensory, attendance. Use school progress data, behaviour logs, work samples, and any clinical reports.
- 2
Ask the school to start the SEN support cycle
Write to the SENDCO requesting the 'assess, plan, do, review' cycle under Chapter 6 of the SEND Code of Practice 2015. Set a clear deadline for a response.
- 3
Track whether SEN support is working
After one or two cycles (usually a term each), look at the data. Is the child catching up, holding ground, or falling further behind? Are the strategies actually being delivered consistently?
- 4
Compare what's needed against what £6,000 buys
If your child needs significant 1:1 support, named therapies, specialist equipment, or a particular setting, this often exceeds what the notional SEN budget can fund — pointing to an EHCP.
- 5
Decide whether to apply for an EHC needs assessment
If SEN support has not been enough, or the level of need clearly cannot be met within mainstream resources, apply for an EHC needs assessment under section 36 CFA 2014. You do not need school permission.
- 6
Keep the SEN support paper trail
Whether or not the EHCP is issued, the SEN support history is a key part of the evidence. Keep every email, plan, review and progress report.
Worked examples
Likely SEN support: moderate dyslexia, making slow but steady progress
A Year 4 pupil with dyslexia who has weekly small-group literacy support, in-class differentiation, and reading-pen access. School data shows steady progress with the support in place. SEN support is likely the right level — escalation to EHCP would only be needed if progress stalls or the gap widens.
EHCP territory: autism + 1:1 needed for safety and access
A Year 2 autistic pupil who cannot remain in class without 1:1 adult support, has frequent meltdowns, requires sensory regulation throughout the day, and is at risk of being unable to attend without consistent specialist provision. The provision needed exceeds what the notional SEN budget can fund — strong EHCP case.
Borderline: ADHD + literacy difficulties at Year 6
Receiving SEN support but progress has plateaued. School is genuinely trying but lacks specialist staffing for the level of intervention required. Apply for an EHC needs assessment so the LA's professional reports establish whether mainstream resources are sufficient — many borderline cases turn out to meet the threshold.
Likely SEN support escalating to EHCP: school refusal linked to anxiety
Initial SEN support — adjusted timetable, key-worker check-ins, low-stim space — may be enough. If anxiety persists, attendance falls below 50%, and CAMHS recommends specialist provision, the EHCP threshold becomes hard to deny.
Signs your child may need an EHCP rather than SEN support
- SEN support has been in place for at least one or two terms with no measurable progress
- The provision required is significantly more than ~£6,000 per year
- Your child needs named therapies (SALT, OT) at a frequency the school cannot fund
- 1:1 support is required for safety, access, or both
- A specialist setting is being seriously considered
- Attendance has dropped substantially because of unmet need
- Multiple professionals (EP, CAMHS, paediatrician) recommend statutory support
Common misunderstandings
- 'You have to try SEN support for a year first' — false; you can apply for an EHC needs assessment at any time
- 'No diagnosis = no SEN support / no EHCP' — false; both are needs-led, not diagnosis-led
- 'The school decides whether to apply for an EHCP' — false; parents and young people can apply directly to the LA
- 'EHCPs are only for special schools' — false; most EHCPs are held by pupils in mainstream
- 'SEN support is legally enforceable' — only loosely; without an EHCP the only remedies are complaints, governors, and (for disabled pupils) the Equality Act 2010
What your pack includes
- EHCP threshold checker tailored to your child's profile
- SEN support → EHCP escalation pathway
- Letter requesting SEN support (template)
- Letter requesting EHC needs assessment (template)
- Evidence checklist for both routes
- Tracker for SEN support reviews and progress data